Prediction of Anna-Lena Friedsam [342nd] vs Emily Appleton [372nd] Head-to-Head At The 1970
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W W W L W W W W W L
Form
W W W W W L L W L LHead-2-Head: Friedsam 2 - 0 Appleton
They have played 5 sets in total, with Friedsam winning 4 and Appleton winning 1. The last match between Friedsam and Appleton was at the W75 Altenkirchen, 13-02-2025, Second, Carpet with Anna-Lena Friedsam getting the victory 7-6(5) 6-2.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Anna-Lena Friedsam | 2 |
| Emily Appleton | 0 |
| Friedsam | Stats | Appleton |
|---|---|---|
| 80% (16-4) | YTD Win/Loss | 69% (18-8) |
| 2 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 342 | Ranking | 372 |
| 45 | Highest Rank | 348 |
| 31 | Age | 25 |
| R | Plays | - |
| 15 | Titles | 4 |
| 60% (377-250) | Career Total W/L | 51% (212-201) |
| $1,078,782 | Career Prize Money | $5,694 |
| 1 | YTD Titles | 1 |
| 0 | Hard H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Clay H2H | 0 |
| 2 | Indoor H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Grass H2H | 0 |
Recent Performance Stats (Last 6 Months)
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-6(5) 6-2 |
Stats 
Anna-Lena Friedsam
Player
Emily Appleton
68%
(
41 of
60)
1st Serve %
67%
(
58 of
87)
3
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
5
83%
(
34 of
41)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
40 of
58)
53%
(
10 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
11 of
29)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
27%
(
16 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
36 of
87)
80
Total Points Won
67
|
||||
| 3-6 6-0 7-5 |
Stats
Anna-Lena Friedsam
Player
Emily Appleton
67%
(
45 of
67)
1st Serve %
49%
(
45 of
91)
5
Aces
7
3
Double Faults
7
76%
(
34 of
45)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
32 of
45)
64%
(
14 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
21 of
46)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
28%
(
19 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
38 of
91)
86
Total Points Won
72
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 4 | Sets Won | 1 |
| 29 | Games Won | 19 |
| 8 | Aces (Total) | 7 |
| 6 | Total Double Faults | 12 |
| 1:51:18 | Average Match Time | 1:51:18 |
| 68% (86/127) | 1st Serve % | 58% (103/178) |
| 79% (68/86) | 1st Serve Win % | 70% (72/103) |
| 59% (24/41) | 2nd Serve Win % | 43% (32/75) |
| 35% (8/23) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 43% (3/7) |
| 42% (74/178) | Return Points Win % | 28% (35/127) |
| 100% (2/2) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/2) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Anna-Lena Friedsam vs Emily Appleton Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Friedsam 2 - 0 Appleton
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Friedsam has won 40.31% of points on their second serve, while Appleton has won 40.93%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Friedsam, in recent form, has won 47.98% of their opponent's second serve points, while Appleton has won 51.45%. The same stats for first serve returns are 29.22% and 26.96% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Friedsam has saved 53.87% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Appleton has saved 50.53% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Friedsam has won 70.97% of matches played (W/L 22/ 9), with Appleton winning 57.38% (W/L 35/ 26) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Friedsam has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 67% (W/L 122/ 59), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 47% (W/L 16/ 18). Appleton has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 59% (W/L 63/ 44), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 41% (W/L 13/ 19).
- Player level: In the last year, Friedsam has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 73.08% of matches (W/L 19/ 7), where as Appleton has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 57.14% of matches (W/L 24/ 18). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Friedsam winning 2 times and Appleton being victorious 0 times. They have played 5 sets in total, with Friedsam winning 4 and Appleton winning 1. The last match between Friedsam and Appleton was at the W75 Altenkirchen, 13-02-2025, Second, Carpet with Anna-Lena Friedsam getting the victory 7-6(5) 6-2.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:51:18.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Friedsam and Appleton have played a deciding set 1 times, with Friedsam winning 1 times and Appleton 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Friedsam winning 1, and Appleton 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Friedsam has played against opponents with an average rank of 341.61 while Appleton has played against players with an average rank of 235.87.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Friedsam has won 60% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Appleton has won 60% in all matches played on tour.
- Current event H2H stats: Past player performance is very useful in predicting tennis matches, but once an event is under way we should also look at current event stats for in form player indication, so check the section below (if they have played a match in the current event). Some players also perform better at certain events and this should be taken into account when picking the outcome.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Friedsam has converted 37.2% of breakpoint opportunities, and Appleton has converted 33.89% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
Anna-Lena Friedsam Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Francesca Curmi
Player
Anna-Lena Friedsam
83%
(
52 of
63)
1st Serve %
64%
(
47 of
73)
0
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
4
73%
(
38 of
52)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
32 of
47)
55%
(
6 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
8 of
26)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
6)
30%
(
19 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
33 of
73)
77
Total Points Won
59
|
6-1 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Anna-Lena Friedsam
Player
Manon Leonard
78%
(
51 of
65)
1st Serve %
50%
(
36 of
72)
4
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
1
78%
(
40 of
51)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
27 of
36)
71%
(
10 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
18 of
36)
50%
(
1 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
23%
(
15 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
27 of
72)
77
Total Points Won
60
|
6-3 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Anna-Lena Friedsam
Player
Alice Robbe
65%
(
56 of
86)
1st Serve %
63%
(
52 of
82)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
7
64%
(
36 of
56)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
33 of
52)
53%
(
16 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
11 of
30)
100%
(
6 of
6)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
40%
(
34 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
38 of
82)
90
Total Points Won
78
|
6-2 5-7 6-3 | H2H | ||
| SF | w/o | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Anna-Lena Friedsam
Player
Elvina Kalieva
70%
(
42 of
60)
1st Serve %
48%
(
30 of
63)
4
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
5
71%
(
30 of
42)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
19 of
30)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
14 of
33)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
32%
(
19 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
30 of
63)
71
Total Points Won
52
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Anna-Lena Friedsam
Player
Emily Appleton
68%
(
41 of
60)
1st Serve %
67%
(
58 of
87)
3
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
5
83%
(
34 of
41)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
40 of
58)
53%
(
10 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
11 of
29)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
27%
(
16 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
36 of
87)
80
Total Points Won
67
|
7-6(5) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Anna-Lena Friedsam
Player
Dalma Galfi
74%
(
61 of
82)
1st Serve %
65%
(
59 of
91)
7
Aces
6
3
Double Faults
5
72%
(
44 of
61)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
40 of
59)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
9 of
32)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
33%
(
27 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
42 of
91)
97
Total Points Won
76
|
6-3 4-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Tyra Caterina Grant
Player
Anna-Lena Friedsam
67%
(
59 of
88)
1st Serve %
62%
(
56 of
90)
0
Aces
4
5
Double Faults
6
64%
(
38 of
59)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
38 of
56)
48%
(
14 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
14 of
34)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
41%
(
36 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
38 of
90)
90
Total Points Won
88
|
1-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Anna-Lena Friedsam
Player
Matilde Paoletti
68%
(
47 of
69)
1st Serve %
72%
(
49 of
68)
3
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
2
70%
(
33 of
47)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
26 of
49)
32%
(
7 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
42%
(
29 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
35 of
68)
75
Total Points Won
62
|
1-6 6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Anna-Lena Friedsam
Player
Lucija Ciric Bagaric
65%
(
42 of
65)
1st Serve %
55%
(
36 of
65)
8
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
6
71%
(
30 of
42)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
23 of
36)
61%
(
14 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
32%
(
21 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
28 of
65)
72
Total Points Won
58
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Emily Appleton Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Tiantsoa Rakotomanga Rajaonah
Player
Emily Appleton
63%
(
44 of
70)
1st Serve %
54%
(
38 of
71)
8
Aces
1
9
Double Faults
8
73%
(
32 of
44)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
23 of
38)
38%
(
10 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
9 of
33)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
40%
(
28 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
39 of
71)
81
Total Points Won
60
|
6-2 7-6(0) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Celia Cervino Ruiz
Player
Emily Appleton
74%
(
43 of
58)
1st Serve %
68%
(
49 of
72)
4
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
3
79%
(
34 of
43)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
31 of
49)
47%
(
7 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
29%
(
17 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
33 of
72)
74
Total Points Won
56
|
7-6(3) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Emily Appleton
Player
Aran Teixido Garcia
69%
(
61 of
89)
1st Serve %
56%
(
59 of
105)
4
Aces
3
8
Double Faults
15
59%
(
36 of
61)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
35 of
59)
32%
(
9 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
16 of
46)
80%
(
8 of
10)
Break Points Won
32%
(
6 of
19)
49%
(
44 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
54 of
105)
99
Total Points Won
95
|
7-5 2-6 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Maddison Inglis
Player
Emily Appleton
62%
(
23 of
37)
1st Serve %
51%
(
24 of
47)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
7
70%
(
16 of
23)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
14 of
24)
71%
(
10 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
17%
(
4 of
23)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
30%
(
11 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
29 of
47)
55
Total Points Won
29
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Christasha McNeil
Player
Emily Appleton
64%
(
34 of
53)
1st Serve %
58%
(
35 of
60)
2
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
5
68%
(
23 of
34)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
23 of
35)
53%
(
10 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
8 of
25)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
38%
(
20 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
29 of
60)
62
Total Points Won
51
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Emily Appleton
Player
Ariana Arseneault
57%
(
35 of
61)
1st Serve %
67%
(
45 of
67)
3
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
4
69%
(
24 of
35)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
21 of
45)
46%
(
12 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
41%
(
25 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
39 of
67)
75
Total Points Won
53
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Emily Appleton
Player
Dasha Ivanova
51%
(
31 of
61)
1st Serve %
71%
(
41 of
58)
3
Aces
1
7
Double Faults
0
61%
(
19 of
31)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
19 of
41)
47%
(
14 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
9 of
17)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
46%
(
28 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
30 of
58)
63
Total Points Won
56
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Emily Appleton
Player
Elizabeth Ionescu
63%
(
37 of
59)
1st Serve %
78%
(
56 of
72)
4
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
1
70%
(
26 of
37)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
28 of
56)
36%
(
8 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
4 of
16)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
42%
(
25 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
40 of
72)
74
Total Points Won
57
|
6-1 2-6 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Emily Appleton
Player
Krisha Mahendran
63%
(
50 of
80)
1st Serve %
78%
(
57 of
73)
5
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
5
72%
(
36 of
50)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
35 of
57)
50%
(
15 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
5 of
16)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
36%
(
29 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
33 of
73)
84
Total Points Won
69
|
6-2 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Emily Appleton
Player
Malaika Rapolu
67%
(
57 of
85)
1st Serve %
48%
(
41 of
85)
14
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
4
72%
(
41 of
57)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
28 of
41)
50%
(
14 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
25 of
44)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
35%
(
30 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
32 of
85)
87
Total Points Won
83
|
6-3 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Where To Watch Friedsam vs Appleton?
When the match starts we will have live scores and stats on this page. For live streaming at TV channels of this match, see our ATP and WTA worldwide viewing pages. Free trial live streaming of Friedsam Vs Appleton is now available here.
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 60% (377/250) | Win/Loss | 51% (212/201) |
| 58% (849/607) | Sets Win/Loss | 51% (484/456) |
| 54% (7251/6269) | Games Win/Loss | 51% (4442/4242) |
| 0.22 | Aces Per Game | 0.39 |
| 1473 | Aces Total | 1667 |
| 0.23 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.48 |
| 1552 | Total Double Faults | 2016 |
| 1:9:24 | Average Match Time | 1:26:12 |
| 161.54 | Average Opponent Rank | 250.18 |
| 65% (20671/31833) | 1st Serve % | 59% (14665/24998) |
| 65% (13489/20671) | 1st Serve Win % | 68% (9973/14665) |
| 46% (5168/11160) | 2nd Serve Win % | 43% (4475/10332) |
| 46% (1571/3436) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 46% (1315/2888) |
| 43% (13426/31514) | Return Points Win % | 43% (11046/25487) |
| 60% (369/614) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 51% (211/412) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 52% (84/163) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 48% (40/83) |
| 53% (112/211) | Deciding Set Win % | 47% (54/115) |
| 85% (377/322) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 85% (221/187) |
| 14% (377/54) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 15% (221/34) |
| 22% (250/54) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 13% (192/25) |
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Anna-Lena Friedsam
View full predicted draw for Friedsam
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
